Workineh Kelbessa completed a Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales: Indigenous
and Modern Environmental Ethics: A Study of the Indigenous Oromo Environmental
Ethic and Oromo Environmental Ethics in the Light of Modern Issues of Environment
and Development. Fall 2001. Explores the linkage between indigenous and
modern environmental ethics by examining the indigenous Oromo environmental
ethic. The Oromo are a traditionally pastoralist people in South-West Ethiopia,
comprising some 30% of the entire Ethiopian population. This undercuts some
modern arguments about what counts as authority, who counts as an expert, and
who counts as a scientist. The Oromo people have developed complex systems of
agriculture and intensive soil, water, vegetation and wildlife management that
have survived the test of time and the vagaries of the environment. These practices
incorporate Oromo values and beliefs more than Western practices incorporate
Western traditional values.
Further, the Oromo world view can serve
as the basis for a contemporary environmental ethic. Unlike anthropocentrists
the Oromo have deep concerns for the future and health of both humans and nonhuman
creatures. But indigenous and modern knowledge are not mutually exclusive. Each
has limitations and neither can be a panacea for all ills in isolation. Both
have something to teach as well as something to learn. In some instances one
is superior to the other. The thesis advisor was Robin Attfield. Kelbessa is
in philosopy, Addis Abbaba University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Helen Barnard completed a. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff, Nature,
Human Nature and Value, December 2006. The main concern of environmental
philosophy has been to find value for nature. This thesis links a theory of
nature, a theory of human nature and a theory of value. A definition of nature
is explored, requiring a brief history of the concept of nature. There has been
a decline of teleological explanations and the development of two main contemporary
explanations of human nature in relation to nature: Ultra-Darwinism (a reductionist
explanation of human nature) and postmodernism. An analysis of these two positions
shows that neither have an adequate metaphysics for finding value in nature,
and this is revealed by an examination of two different types of environmental
philosophy influenced respectively by the two opposing views.
The problem of values is discussed
with particular emphasis on moral values. An argument for objective values based
on objective knowledge is put forward as well as a theory of human nature which
leads to the conclusion that teleological explanations link a theory of nature,
a theory of human nature and a theory of value more satisfactorily than the
non-teleological explanations of Ultra-Darwinism and postmodernism. This conclusion
is relevant to the problems of the environment. The advisor was Robin Attfield.
University of Edinburgh. There is a MSc in Human Ecology, also a diploma,
a one-year course. Relationships between people and environment, including ecological
economics, sustainability, gender politics, Agenda 21, environmental planning,
agriculture, foresty, spiritual perspectives, creativity, community. Centre
for Human Ecology, University of Edinburgh, 12 Roseneath Place, Edinburgh EH9
1JB, UK. Phone 44 (0)131 624 1974. Fax 44 (0)131 228 9630.
E-mail: registrar@che.ac.uk. Web: www.che.ac.uk
University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia offers both the M.A. and Ph.D degrees, with the possibility of a degree in environmental philosophy. Andrew Brennan, Head of the Department, has a principal interest in this field. Contact Andrew Brennan, Head, Department of Philosophy, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. Fax: (09) 380 1057. Phone (09) 380 2107.
Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia. Stephan Millett completed
a Ph.D. thesis, Autopoiesis and Immanent Teleology: Toward an Aristotelian
Environmental Ethic, 1997. The contemporary concept of autopoiesis
is enriched by coupling it with an Aristotelian concept of immanent teology,
and such a metaphysical concept of nature can serve as a basis of environmental
ethics. Millett is now Director, Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy,
Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA.
University of Newcastle, Callaghan, N.S.W. (Newcastle area). Bruce A. Anthony completed a Ph.D. thesis in the Department of Philosophy, Towards the Recognition of a Necessary Environmental Value, May 1997. Anthony surveys the contemporary theories in environmental ethics, especially that of Holmes Rolston, and argues for a theory of value to be distinguished from a theory of the good. There are two necessary environmental values: (1) It is valuable to be a valuer, which is the positive value of the capacity to value. (2) The ground of such valuing is itself valuable, which is the positive value of the ground of the capacity to value. This latter is best applied to the ecosystemic matrix of value, and from this one can conclude that one ought not to degrade the ground of the capacity to value.
Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Greg R. Pritchard completed a Ph.D. thesis, Econstruction: The Nature/Culture Opposition in Texts about Whales and Whaling, 2004, Faculty of Arts. This thesis investigates the perceived opposition between "culture" and "nature", presented as a dominant, biased and antagonistic relationship, engrained in the language of Western culture. By focusing on whale texts (including older narratives, whaling books, novels and other whale-related texts), it explores the portrayal of whales and the natural world. And, lastly, it suggests that Schopenhaurean thought, which has affinities in Moby-Dick, offers a cogent approach to ecocritically reading literature.
University of Queensland, Australia. Paul Francis York completed a Ph.D.
thesis:Respect for the World: Universal Ethics and the Morality of Terraforming.
2005. An examination of the morality of large-scale efforts to transform
inanimate parts of nature, for example, proposals to terraform Mars. Such
an ethics expands the class of entities regarded as morally considerable to
include inanimate entities. Builds on the theory of Paul W. Taylor, in
his Respect for Nature. Proposes two extensions: an expansion of the
scope of moral considerability to include all concrete material objects and
the introduction of variable moral significance (all entities have inherent
worth but some have more than others). Develops a universal ethics,
an ethical framework whose key elements are a fundamental ethical attitude of
respect for the world and a principle of minimal harm. Universal ethics
regards all concrete material entities, whether living or not, and whether natural
or artefactual, as inherently valuable, and therefore as entitled to the respect
of moral agents. Concludes that terraforming Mars or any other celestial
body at this point in our history would be morally wrong. Also suggests
that universal ethics provides an ethical foundation for efforts to protect
Antarctica.
University of Göteborg, Sweden. Bolof Stridbeck completed a doctoral dissertation in practical philosophy at the Humanities faculty at the University of Göteborg, June 1993. Published as Ekosofi och Etik (Göteborg, Sweden: Bokskogen, 1994). ISBN 91 7776 070 0. With an English summary, pp. 289-299. Deals with selected Norwegian and other ecophilosophers: Sigmund Kvaloy (Sätereng). Hjalmar Hegge. Arne Naess, Henryk Skolimowski. Generally he finds that these thinkers complement one another. Finally, the political strategy of Thomas Mathiesen, for promoting "ecological balance and creative manifoldness."
University of Göteborg, Sweden. Petra Andersson completed
a Ph.D. thesis: Humanity and Nature: Towards a Consistent Holistic Environmental
Ethics. Published as Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Philosophica Gothoburgensia,
no 20, 2007. ISSN: 0283-2380 ISBN: 978-91-7346-578-6. Within the theoretical
framework of holistic environmental ethics, moral status is ascribed to biotic
wholes, such as ecosystems, species and landscapes. The purpose of holistic
environmental ethics is not entirely clear, since the framework contains conflicting
ideas about which properties of the biotic whole contribute to moral status,
and to which moral reasons this moral status gives rise. The tensions are organized
in three themes: human-centered, integrity-centered, and nature-centered ethics.
If naturalness is
seen as a binary property, it creates a grave incoherence. If naturalness is
instead understood in more nuanced terms (so that naturalness can be a question
of different degrees or senses), some of these problems become less serious,
but new problems emerge. In particular, the question whether a version of holistic
environmental ethics that incorporates nature-centeredness may allow human beings
a reasonable space remains. If nature-centeredness is rejected, however, several
internal tensions within a holistic environmental ethics may be resolved. A
plausible ethics should abandon the nature-centered theme, i.e. reject the idea
of "natural nature" as being morally significant in itself.
The idea that integrity
gives rise to moral status of a biotic whole is more fruitful, and can also
be combined with most of the particular opinions that might motivate nature-centeredness.
Integrity-centeredness may also be consistently combined with human-centeredness,
and a holistic environmental ethic may thus provide reasonable room for human
beings in nature.
University of Helsinki, Finland. Leena Vilkka finished a Ph.D. thesis,
The Varieties of Intrinsic Value in Nature: A Naturistic Approach to Environmental
Philosophy (in English), November 1995. The thesis examines the varieties
of intrinsic value in nature proposed by various philosophers and then progressively
defends an animal-centered philosophy (zoocentrism), a life centered- philosophy
(biocentrism) and an ecosystem-centered philosophy (ecocentrism), culminating
in a defense of objective intrinsic value in nature and of the rights of animals.
The thesis was published in 1997 by Editions Rodopi (Amsterdam/Atlanta) in their
Value Inquiry Book Series, Robert Ginsburg, editor. This was the first Ph.D.
thesis in Finland in environmental philosophy. The thesis advisor was Ilkka
Niiniluoto; the "opponent" at the defense was Holmes Rolston. Vilkka is now
a docent at the University of Helsinki, Department of Philosophy.
University of Turku, Finland. Markku Oksanen completed a Ph.D. thesis, summer 1998, published as Nature as Property: Environmental Ethics and the Institution of Ownership. Turku, Finland: Reports from the Department of Practical Philosophy, University of Turku, Volume 10, 1998. ISSN 0786-8111. ISBN 951-29-1191-4 Juhani Pietarinen of the Department of Philosophy was princpial advisor. A study of the conceptual and practical implications of the institution of ownership, when ecological concerns are profoundly taken into account. Can natural things be owned? On what grounds are they ownable? Assuming that natural objects are ownable, how do we apply these norms in practice? The Western understanding of, and the attitude to, nature are changing and the change may extend to concern the institution of ownership. Particularly land ownership is in many cases directly related to the emergence of ecological problems.
Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Bernard Marsh completed a S.T.D. degree thesis, Towards a Theology of Ecology, 1994. 380 Pages. Facultad de teologia, Universidad de Navarra. The roots of the ecological crisis and the theological responses to it. Positions regarding God and divine creative activity, and some conceptions of the value of human and non-human creatures. Exemplarism and sacramental views of nature as ways of appreciating creation, and emphasis on responsibility, work and virtues as delineating the human role within creation. A theology of ecology that stresses the importance of revelation and builds upon a solid ontological foundation essential for such a theology. This foundation involves an understanding of the value of all creatures and the order in creation. A section: "Anthropology and the Human Itinerary" sketches the role properly belonging to the image and likeness of God in the world with its personal and social dimensions. The impact of sin and redemption on the whole of creation is discussed. Finally, three theological virtues are related to a fully personal response to the ecological crisis.
Loughborough University, UK. John Studley completed in 2005 a Ph.D.
thesis, Sustainable Knowledge Systems and Resource Stewardship: in Search
of Ethno-Forestry Paradigms for the Indigenous Peoples of Eastern Kham,
at Department of Geography. This study examines resource stewardship among indigenous
peoples from a neglected angle, that of knowledge sustainability and synergistic
bridging, using the cognitive mapping of forest values among Tibetan minority
nationalities in Eastern Kham. This involves a critique of the narratives of
John Locke. There is compelling evidence suggesting homogeneity in forest values
with up to five geospatial paradigms and up to twelve cognitive paradigms.
Indigenous knowledge cannot
be sustained if it is integrated into western knowledge systems due to the lack
of conceptual frameworks for cross-cultural integration. Under the rubric of
post-modernism, however, there are a number of complimentary trajectories, which
provide space for knowledge equity, sustainability and bridging. These trajectories
include hypertext theory, paradigm theory, abductive logic, adaptive management,
ecospiritual paradigms, and post-modern forestry paradigms. This offers planners
globally a means for bridging between local and non-local knowledge systems
on the road to sustainable forestry and biodiversity stewardship. Supervisors:
D. Slater, E. Brown and T. Skelton. The external examiner was Raymond Bryant,
Department of Geography, King College, London University. Online at:
https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/2101
Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium. Nathan Edward Kowalsky completed a Ph.D. thesis, Beyond Natural Evil, . May 2006. The problem of natural evil is largely unresolved in the philosophy of religion and is problematic in environmental ethics. Philosophers of religion presuppose (1) that natural evil is an obvious fact, (2) that suffering equal evil, and (3) that the natural world is obviously improvable and should be improved. Environmental philosophers, for the most part, argue that "anthropocentrism" should be eschewed because it leads to ecological catastrophe. All these presuppositions are in fact anthropocentric and should be eschewed. To equate suffering with evil is to neglect the difference between species. Judgments of natural evil require the is/ought dichotomy, which functions only so far as it is anthropocentric. Natural evil is not an obvious fact about the world., but such judgments assume an ecological imperialism. The natural world is not naturally improvable. Ecological imperialism is Gnostic. Judgments of natural evil assume anti-theism. They cannot pose a problem for theism. There is no evil in nature. The advisor (promoter) was Ullrich Melle. Kowalsky is now on the faculty at St. Joseph's College, University of Alberta.
University Paris-12 (Paris Val-de-Marne, Créteil, France). Julien
Delord completed a Ph. D thesis The Extinction of Species: Historical and
Moral Issues of an Ecological Concept in 2003. Global biodiversity is presently
falling victim to a major extinction crisis, which also implicates a moral crisis
for the human species. I attempt to understand the extent to which the extinction
of species is a legitimate subject of moral concern and I consider philosophical
arguments that have been formulated to justify the protection of species. I
also investigate the historical causes behind this delayed awareness of the
ecological significance of extinction. Both the slow intellectual development
of the idea of extinction throughout human history and the scientific emergence
of the concept are explored. Finally, I investigate the notion of extinction
by comparing it with the notion of individual death. I employ a comparative
phenomenological and epistemological approach between death and extinction.
This leads me to expound an original solution to the issue of nature conservation,
the norm of "sauvageté", a "de-ideologized" and functional
notion of wildness. The full text (in French) is available at:
http://doxa.scd.univ-paris12.fr:80/theses/th0211085.pdf
The supervisor was Jean Gayon (Paris 1 - La Sorbonne). Delord is now assistant
professor in history and philosophy of science, University of Brest, France
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (University of Leuven). Benjamin Howe
completed a Ph.D. thesis,, The Environmental Philosophy of Arne Naess and
the History of Its Reception, November 2008. The last living participant
in the seminars of the Vienna Circle, Arne Naess, has been considered the founder
of a school of thought called deep ecology since the early 1980s. Supporters
of this school are said to accept the central concept of his writings on environmentalism,
what he refers to as the deep ecology movement. I critically examine this convention
by looking at not only his environmental philosophy, but also, his place in
the history of analytic philosophy. Naess claims that his environmental
philosophy is informed by the approach to semantics that he began to defend
during the late 1930s in reaction to logical positivism's conception of meaning.
From 1945 to 1960, Naess and a group of Norwegian philosophers and social scientists
put his philosophy of language into practice by designing a social science of
semantics that collected data on ordinary speakers' understanding of expressions,
such as "democracy" and "truth."
Despite convention,
the literature on Naess does not warrant confidence in his status as deep ecology's
founder. The school's supporters defend competing interpretations of his concept
of the deep ecology movement, and Naess has done little to clarify his position.
He rarely mentions his supporters and never states what, if any, common ground
he shares with them. All commentators ignore some of his key texts and misunderstand
the relationship between his philosophy of language and the concept of the deep
ecology movement The first philosophers to identify themselves as deep ecologists
overlooked his most significant papers, including one that compares his environmental
philosophy to a study on semantics and political rhetoric that he conducted
for UNESCO. The advisor was Ullrich Melle. Howe
is now teaching philosophy Seattle University
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Zhao, Hong-mei completed and published a Ph.D. dissertation at the Department of Philosophy, Wuhan University. Mei Xue Zou Xiang Huang Ye: Lun Luo Er Si Dun Huan Jing Mei Xue Si Xiang (Aesthetics Gone Wild: On the Thought of Rolston's Environmental Aesthetic). Beijing: Chinese Social Science Publishing Co., 2009. ISBN 978-7-5004-8146-1. LC Call #: BH301.E58 Z43 2009. Rolston's positive analysis of rich meanings in the word "wild" relate to spontaneous creativity and freedom, an important support of, and foil to, artifacted creativity and freedom in culture. Humans emerge from this wildness, and in scientific technology, they increasingly set themselves against wildness, and this leaves them homeless. Rolston contests traditional axiologies of valueless nature. He claims we ought to discover and value wild nature. In aesthetics, this leads Rolston both to make claims about aesthetic value in nature and to distinguish such value from that of from art in culture. He also finds that such aesthetic value in nature is understood more deeply if it is science-based. A further dimension is that there is positive aesthetic experience in the struggle for existence in nature. This revises accounts of what we might first think to be ugly in nature. Appreciation of wildness is not the peaceful observation of the picturesque, but requires immersion and experience of life in the wild, immersion of body and of spirit. This does give us a sense of being at home in the wild nature out of which humans evolved. It also moves us from beauty to responsibility for the conservation of nature." Zhao also draws some comparisons and contrasts with Asian thought. The advisor was Chen, Wangheng.
Fuhan University, Shanghai, China. Yang, Yingzi completed in 2007 and published a Ph.D. dissertation at Fuhan University: Lunli de Shengtai XiangduLuoersidun huanjing lunli sixian yanjiu (Ecological Orientation of Ethics: A Study in Rolston's Environmental Ethics). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2010. ISBN 978-7-5004-8712-8. LC Call #: GE42.Y56 2010. Western concepts of environmental ethics, appearing from the 1970s as a result of the environmental crisis, have affirmed that nature warrants moral standing. Holmes Rolston III, a founder of environmental ethics, claims that nature has intrinsic value, and humans a duty to respect this. He lays the ontological foundations for extending ethics to ecosystems, with which humans have a dialectical and complementary relation, and he criticizes injustice in modern capitalist societies, which do not appropriately respect nature. This moral blind-spot he also traces to the individualism, anthropocentrism, and vulgar materialism that have resulted from the Western Enlightenment. This implies that the ecological crisis cannot ultimately be resolved with the modernity of the contemporary Western worldview, but will require radical transformation of such modernity. Three important implications of this ecological orientation of ethics are: (1) We need an ecological orientation of our lifestyles and habitats, realizing that we live not simply in culture but also are supported by nature. (2) We need to revise self-interests with an altruistic sense of living in a community that is prior to oneself. (3) Growing out of this dialectic and complementarity, we need a sense of living in two fields, nature and culture, with a harmonious life. In this way, an ecological orientation of ethics has a universal and profound philosophical and social significance. In the published book, Holmes Rolston writes a forward, which is in both English and Chinese. Yang Yingzi is now a faculty member in philosophy at Hainan Normal University, which is located on Hainan Island, PR China. yyzethics@yahoo.com.cn
University of North Texas. Gao, Shan, who is from China, completed a Ph.D. thesis, The Beauty of Nature as the Foundation for Environmental Ethics: China and the West at the University of North Texas, Department of Philosophy, spring 2012. See under graduate studies in North America.
University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Haydn Washington completed a Ph.D., thesis, The Wilderness Knot, 2006. The confused and tangled meanings that surround the term "wilderness." To some it is the original and best of planet Earth, to others it is just a Western construct. This confusion has reached the stage where, despite the formal definitions of wilderness, some scholars can argue to protect large natural areas, yet be highly critical of the term wilderness. There are at least five strands that make up the wilderness knot. These are philosophical, political, cultural, justice and exploitation strands. Wilderness is disliked by both Modernist thought as well as some strands of Postmodernism and is something of an orphan philosophically. Only Romantics, some Deep Ecologists, and some environmentalists champion its cause. Wilderness is also caught up in the debate around anthropocentrism and ecocentrism - or whether humans or the whole ecosystem should be central in one's world view. Wilderness also gets involved in the debate about humans being part of nature. Some confuse our evolutionary heritage (where we obviously are part of nature) with a question of ethics. That humans are natural does not mean that what we do is necessarily ethical or good, or even sensible. There is also the issue of a philosophical concern about creating a human/nature split (= dualism) and whether this is somehow related to wilderness. There is legitimate worry about this human/nature dualism, but Postmodernist philosophers such as Cronon and Callicott, who seek to link this to wilderness. only confuse the term.
Jilin University, China. Yan, Wang completed a Ph.D. thesis, Huan Jing Lun Li:Ren yu Zi Ran Guan Xi He Xie de Lun Li Zhi Dian (Environmental Ethics: the Ethical Fulcrum of the Harmonious Relationship between Humans and Nature) , Philosophy Department, June, 2008. An account of how environmental ethics has turned out to be an ethical fulcrum between humans and nature. The thesis begins with the generation and background of environmental ethics, its originating roots, follows its ideological evolution, modern constructions,and appraises the value and significance of environmental ethics. It demonstrates the possibility and rationality of environmental ethics as a philosophical paradigm. It provides essential theoretical preparations for establishing environmental ethical disciplines with Chinese characteristics. Yan Wang is now an associate professor in School of Humanity and Sociology, BeiHang University, Beijing, China.