Four key variables can be used to analyze the nature of communication in an organization. However, the impact of the variables listed below can be moderated or influenced by other situational factors as well, including:
.
Valence of organizational mood Types and uses of feedback channels Relationship of climate to social/structure variables Attitudes of people toward the organization as a place to work (positive versus negative)
Is feedback sufficient? Does feedback occur at right levels? Do managers convey trust and openness? Do messages reflect the sought-after climate?
Minimize status barriers Support openness
Actual and potential patterns of relationships
Frequency of interaction (and for what content types) Co-orientation measures (accuracy, congruency and agreement of viewpoints)
Are some networks used for only certain types of content? What norms or rules govern use of different networks? Can these rules be changed? Are some messages given but not received because of network type? Is the degree of interaction appropriate?
Change existing networks Examine whether current networks are appropriate to nature of information being transmitted
How much information can people handle and in what form or channel?
Number of judgments that must be taken into account when processing.
Outcome Measures: Predictability of load effects by channel Predictability of load effects by content type.
What is appropriate for different people, units and types of information? Which channels heighten and lessen load for different types of information?
Suggest changes in channels used and types of messages based upon channel capacity and characteristics.
Matching of the direction of communication with the nature of the information and the goals of the organization
Horizontal--functional, but too often developed on an ad-hoc basis and leaves to chance who works together Upward--Provides for subordinate feedback, thus increasing involvement, satisfaction, ownership. Resulting sense of empowerment leads to improved production effectiveness.
Participants in each type Uses of information with each type People's desires to have access to additional information
Upward communication demonstrates feedback, trust and other dimensions of communication climate. Quality of horizontal communicaiton indicates degree to which people work effectively outside the chain of command.
Modify management style Alter levels of information Match message type to flow.
Posted September 2000
Variable
Description
Measurement
Scope of Explanatory Power
Possible Solutions or Recommendations
Communication Climate Includes openness, trust, availability of feedback channels, quality of message flow
Nature of supervisor/subordinate relations (status barriers) Does the climate fit the type of organization? Encourage feedback
Communication Networks Includes natures of links (symmetric or assymetric--i.e. equal or unequal), strength of link, interaction frequency, reciprocity (agreement on nature of the link)
Balance or equality of interactions Which types of networks are functional or dysfunctional? Identify additional networks needed
Communication Load Concept applies to individuals, dyads, work groups and whole organizations
Process Measures:
Rate and number of communication demands received and acted upon in a given time period
Quality of processing: message awareness, comprehension, elaboration and retentionOverload versus underload. Enhance ability of people to process information
Flow Downward--follows organizational chart. Number and type of messages going each way Downward communication is good indication of management skills. Change communication channel
Printing Problems? This document might be wider than your browser screen. To view or print this document, reduce the font size used by your browser to display and print materials. Netscape users can go to Edit/Preferences/Font Size and change the default font size to 9.
Return to Hallahan Course Resources
Return to Communication Management Program home page.